<\/p>\n
In 2008 he published an intriguing paper called What Makes People Vote Republican<\/em><\/strong><\/a>?\u00a0 More recently Haidt published Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations<\/a><\/em><\/strong> (2009<\/em>).\u00a0 This paper explicitly deals with, from an empirical perspective, the essence of my question.\u00a0 Haidt starts his paper with:<\/p>\n “Political campaigns spend vast sums appealing to the self-interests of voters, yet rational self-interest often shows a weak and unstable relationship to voting behavior (Kinder, 1998; Miller, 1999; Sears & Funk, 1991). Voters are also influenced by a wide variety of social and emotional forces (Marcus, 2002; Westen, 2007). Some of these forces are trivial or peripheral factors whose influence we lament, such as a candidate\u2019s appearance (Ballew & Todorov, 2007). In recent years increasing attention has been paid to the role of another class of non-self-interested concerns: morality. Voters who seem to vote against their material self-interest are sometimes said to be voting instead for their values, or for their vision of a good society (Lakoff, 2004; Westen, 2007). However, the idea of what makes for a good society is not universally shared. The \u201cculture war\u201d that has long marked American politics (Hunter, 1991) is a clash of visions about such fundamental moral issues as the authority of parents, the sanctity of life and marriage, and the proper response to social inequalities.”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n Haidt’s contention is that this culture war boils down to an issue of differing moral schema. Some might argue that it is purely an issue of degree of morality – both sides can legitimately claim a moral high ground (at least from their vantage points). As it turns out, morality is nuanced and necessitates a more complex understanding than what has traditionally been understood to be a singular concept quantified by a matter of degree. So it is not as though Republicans are more moral than Democrats (or vice versa), it is that Republican values differ in emphasis relative to Democratic values.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n To make this more concrete, I need to expand upon the discussion of morality.\u00a0 A common conceptualization of morality from the late 20th Century was put forth by the Berkley psychologist Elliot Turiel who said that morality refers to “prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other<\/em>” (Haidt, 2008).\u00a0 This definition might resonate with some – particularly those with liberal tendencies, but it misses several core issues that are important to a substantial subset of the population.\u00a0 Haidt (2008) notes that morality is more than the golden rule,\u00a0 it has to do with “….binding groups together, supporting essential institutions, and living in a sanctified and noble way.” <\/em> These latter issues constitute the divide in the culture war, driving the conservative platform on issues relevant to God, Gays, guns, and immigration (Haidt, 2008). \u00a0 The people on the right tend to hold a moral imperative to foster a unified and morally ordered society.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Each side of the debate holds deep convictions regarding what makes up a good society.\u00a0 Liberals seem to hold morals consistent with a “contractual society” championed by John Stuart Mill, whereas a “…Millian society at its best would be a peaceful, open, and creative place where diverse individuals respect each other’s rights and band together voluntarily to help those in need or to change the laws for the common good” <\/em>(Haidt 2008).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Conservatives tend to hold values more in line with sociologist, Emile Durkheim, who valued social order, restraint,\u00a0 and conventions all held together by a strict authority.\u00a0\u00a0 “A Durkheimian society at its best would be a stable network composed of many nested and overlapping groups that socialize, reshape, and care for individuals who, if left to their own devices, would pursue shallow, carnal, and selfish pleasures. A Durkheimian society would value self-control over self-expression, duty over rights, and loyalty to one’s group over concerns for outgroups”<\/em> (Haidt, 2008).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Haidt has been conducting research into what have been identified as five universal morals (similar in concept to those laid out by Mill and Durkheim) including: (a) harm\/care (strong empathy for those that are suffering and care for the most vulnerable); (b) fairness\/reciprocity (life liberty and justice for all); (c) ingroup\/loyalty – (tribalism, patriotism, nationalism); (d) authority\/respect (“mechanisms for managing social rank, tempered by the obligation of superiors to protect and provide for subordinates<\/em>” Haidt, 2008); and (e) purity\/sanctity (“related to the evolution of disgust, that makes us see carnality as degrading and renunciation as noble<\/em>” Haidt, 2008).\u00a0 Millians and liberals tend to value care and fairness at a higher level than their conservative counterparts and hold a lower valuation of ingroup loyalty, authority and purity\/sancity – while conservatives value all at a uniform level.\u00a0 See Figure 1 below for the distribution of values by political affiliation as reported in Graham, Haidt, and Nosek’s (2009) paper.<\/p>\n Haidt (2008) notes:<\/p>\n “In several large internet surveys, my collaborators Jesse Graham, Brian Nosek and I have found that people who call themselves strongly liberal endorse statements related to the harm\/care and fairness\/reciprocity foundations, and they largely reject statements related to ingroup\/loyalty, authority\/respect, and purity\/sanctity. People who call themselves strongly conservative, in contrast, endorse statements related to all five foundations more or less equally.”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n I found that my moral value scores lined up perfectly with my political affiliation. \u00a0 You can see for yourself where your values fall relative to your political affiliation by taking the Moral Foundations Questionnaire<\/strong><\/em> at www.YourMorals.org<\/a><\/strong>. If you look at the data you’ll see that strongly conservative folks are not more moral than strongly liberal folks, it is just that they weigh the universal morals differently.\u00a0 It is these tendencies that leave individuals in both groups questioning the morals of the other group.\u00a0 On all moral domains there is divergence.\u00a0 If you look at the issues individually through the lenses of those with divergent perspectives it is not difficult to see how liberals could judge conservatives as amoral and vice versa. \u00a0 When looking at this social divergence from the framework that Haidt puts forth, the divide becomes less enigmatic.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Go to Haidt’s website<\/a> and take the Moral Foundations Questionnaire<\/strong><\/em> and see how your results fit with your political affiliation and then let me know how you feel about your score and the subsequent implications.\u00a0 Next week I’ll delve a bit deeper into Haidt’s paper entitled Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations<\/a><\/em><\/strong> (2009<\/em>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n References:<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Graham, J., Haidt, J., and Nosek, B. (2009<\/em>).<\/a> Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations<\/a><\/em><\/strong>. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,\u00a0 Vol. 96, No. 5, 1029\u20131046<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Haidt, J. (2008). What Makes People Vote Republican?<\/strong><\/em> http:\/\/www.edge.org\/3rd_culture\/haidt08\/haidt08_index.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The state of affairs in the United States when it comes to politics seems intractable.\u00a0 I used to believe that a person’s political position could be easily placed on a traditional left – right continuum.\u00a0 However, if you watch the political pundits on TV, this no longer seems possible.\u00a0 Apparently there are two distinct mindsets … <\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/geraldguild.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/09\/moral-divergence-by-political-identity.png\" "\\"moral")
<\/a><\/p>\n